|
ON THIS PAGE
|
|
|
|
|
ARCHIVES
|
| May, 2008 (3) |
| April, 2008 (13) |
| March, 2008 (11) |
| February, 2008 (18) |
| January, 2008 (17) |
| December, 2007 (12) |
| November, 2007 (2) |
| October, 2007 (6) |
| September, 2007 (1) |
| August, 2007 (2) |
| July, 2007 (7) |
| June, 2007 (1) |
| May, 2007 (1) |
| April, 2007 (2) |
| March, 2007 (2) |
| February, 2007 (1) |
| January, 2007 (16) |
| December, 2006 (3) |
| November, 2006 (7) |
| October, 2006 (5) |
| September, 2006 (1) |
| June, 2006 (4) |
| May, 2006 (3) |
| April, 2006 (3) |
| March, 2006 (17) |
| February, 2006 (5) |
| January, 2006 (13) |
| December, 2005 (2) |
| November, 2005 (6) |
| October, 2005 (15) |
| September, 2005 (16) |
| August, 2005 (17) |
|
|
|
CATEGORIES
|
|
|
|
|
BLOGROLL
|
|
|
|
|
LINKS
|
|
|
|
|
SEARCH
|
|
|
|
|
MY BOOKS
|
|
|
|
|
DISCLAIMER
|
Powered by:
newtelligence dasBlog 1.9.7067.0
The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent
my employer's view in any way.
© Copyright
2008
,
Ted Neward
E-mail
|
|
|
|
|
 Wednesday, April 30, 2008
|
Why, Apple, Why?
|
|
So I see, via the blogosphere, that a Java 6 update is available for the Mac, so I run off to the Apple website to download the package. Click on the link, and I'm happy. Wait.... It's for 64-bit Intel Macs only?!? Apple, why do you tease me this way? Why is it that you can build it for 64-bit machines, but not 32-bit? This just seems entirely spurious and artificial. Somebody please tell me that it's otherwise, and why, because until then, I'm going to just assume that Apple doesn't give a whit about Java.
|
|